According to news on April 16, 2026, the United States is about to launch a large-scale tariff refund process, involving a total amount of more than 1.1 trillion yuan, equivalent to 166 billion U.S. dollars. This can be called the largest tariff return action involving funds in the history of the United States.

This tariff refund stems from the final ruling at the US judicial level.
Previously, the Trump administration used relevant bills to promote global tariff increases, which were deemed by the U.S. Supreme Court as an act of exceeding the president’s authority. There was no legal basis for the entire process of imposing relevant tariffs.
Subsequently, the U.S. Court of International Trade issued an order requiring relevant departments to fully refund the illegally levied tariffs to relevant companies and pay corresponding interest.
Currently, the relevant processing procedures for tariff refunds have entered the preparatory stage for implementation.
The exclusive electronic application system will be officially launched on April 20 and will be open to eligible companies across the United States.
This refund covers only registered importers in the United States, and more than 330,000 companies and more than 50 million customs declaration documents are included in the scope of processing.
So far, more than 56,000 companies have completed the preliminary registration procedures, involving a refund amount of nearly 870 billion yuan, and more companies will participate in the process in the future.

For China’s domestic export market, this will have a direct chain reaction.
The operating costs of U.S. importers will be significantly reduced with the refund of tariffs, and their willingness to purchase Chinese goods will also increase. The volume of foreign trade orders is expected to rise steadily.
The highest 36.8% tariff that had been illegally levied previously was officially abolished, and the relevant comprehensive trade tax rate fell back to 21.2%, and foreign trade transaction costs were effectively controlled.
It is worth noting that Chinese-funded enterprises that have established subsidiaries in the United States can directly participate in refund applications and become the direct beneficiary group of this policy adjustment.
However, this tariff refund is not a trade benefit initiated by the United States, but an enforcement action under a judicial ruling.
Moreover, this refund does not involve all tariffs to China, and relevant tariffs such as Section 301 will still maintain the original collection standards.
The refund funds will first be released to the account of the U.S. importer, and then gradually transmitted to domestic export companies through the international trade chain, bringing indirect benefits.
This policy change also brings new development ideas to the foreign trade industry.
Relevant companies can contact U.S. partners in a timely manner, follow up on the progress of tariff refunds, and sort out cost adjustment plans for cooperation orders.
Foreign trade practitioners need to accurately distinguish between different tariff policies, seize the market opportunities brought by this policy, and at the same time prevent and control long-term trade risks, and rely on policy changes to optimize their overseas market layout.
In short, Chinese foreign trade companies should actively respond to this change and strive for a more favorable position in the international market.